From: "Robert McIntosh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I've been playing around quite a bit with Jelly and I found a need to > invoke static methods without having an object instance, like InvokeTag > requires. An example of this would be the System class. So, I created > one and happily contributing it if it is wanted.
Great stuff - I've wanted to get around this issue too. Adding support for methods on Class instances in Jexl might be a good idea too. Patch applied. I made a couple of minor changes, mostly that Class.forName() is evil... http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/stories/2003/02/12/classfornameIsEvil.html so I refactored that part of the code a little and migrated the code to the new checked exception API. > It is fully JavaDoced, but while I have tested the code that does the > invocation via other means, I don't have a junit for this tag in particular. A JUnit test case for this code would be great :) James ------- http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/ __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
