Fine by me. The code is pretty clean by now and I guess people are using
it. Maybe remove the dependency on commons-logging and that's it. (I
think QDox is the only other dependency...?)

The code in Nanning looks quite a bit different but the only major
changes I've done are using the lower-level API of QDox, incremental
compilation and introducing a ClassAttributes-object (increases
performance by a factor of at least 10 by caching the lookups instead of
concatenating strings for each lookup).

On Sun, 2003-06-08 at 11:11, Paul Hammant wrote:
> Well I volunteer to help this get promoted out of sandbox.  I've done work on it 
> before (pairing
> with James Strachan - which he never committed - grumble grumble ;)
> 
> Jon, that sound good to you ?
> 
> - Paul
> 
>  --- robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i'm against nominating
> committers for work on sandbox components.
> > 
> > (apache committers should just be able to request karma and then check 
> > with the current committers that it's ok to join the fun.)
> > 
> > if jon is an existing apache committer then he needs to post a request to 
> > the pmc cc'ing commons-dev giving some brief indications of his plans. we 
> > should then be able to sort out karma with infrastructure.
> > 
> > IMHO if jon is not then the best solution would be for an existing apache 
> > committer to volunteer (yourself, maybe) to lead an effort to push 
> > attributes forward to a stage where it's ready for promotion to the common 
> > proper.
> > 
> > BTW are there any copyright issues associated with the Nanning code?
> > 
> > - robert
> > 
> > On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 11:33 AM, Paul Hammant wrote:
> > 
> > > Jon has been working on attributes inside Nanning's CVS. The code we have 
> > > (which is really) good
> > > is an earlier fork of that.  Is there any way we can get Jon commit provs 
> > > here?  The version in
> > > Nanning is much more advanced than the version he donated to us earlier.
> > >
> > > If we can get some consensus, I think a vote may be a good idea.  Surely 
> > > he must qualify on the
> > > multi-month patch donator principle?
> > >
> > > - Paul
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
> > > http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >  
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Plus - For a better Internet experience
> http://uk.promotions.yahoo.com/yplus/yoffer.html
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to