Thanks, good points. - Dmitri
--- Victor Volle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > some nitpicking from me (currently trying to write a user guide for > me): > > why is > > ReflectedPropertyIntrospector > > not called > > ReflectionPropertyInspector? > > Would be a little bit clearer from my point of view, that objects of > this > class are actively > doing something. > > I do not like the names of ~Support classes. ~Support or ~Helper > indicate > (for me) > that these are Helper classes with (often static) utility functions. > In the > Java API I think > I have found the usage of Abstract~ or Base~ much more often for > classes > like > the ~Support classes in Clazz. E.g. > > ReflectedPropertyIntrospectorSupport > > might be called > > AbstractReflectedPropertyIntrospector or > BaseReflectedPropertyIntrospector > > > and to keep it consistent with my previous remark, it should be > called: > > AbstractReflectionPropertyIntrospector or > BaseReflectionPropertyIntrospector > > I would easily agree that these are minor changes, but since I have > such a > difficult > time understanding the framework, I just write down every single > issue I > stumble > upon. > > Regards > Victor > > PS: more to come > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
