As long as 'ant test' and 'maven jar' run all the unit tests [rather than any performance tests] I don't mind what's going on.
I'm -1 to 'ant test'/'maven jar' not running all the tests, and hadn't realised it wasn't running them all. Hen On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote: > I'm think -1 to forcing the user to use "**/TestAll.java" to > select the unit test suite to execute. What's the harm in giving the user > a way to execute the full test suite without using Ant/Maven or an IDE to > inspect the filesystem for Test classes? > > On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > Currently neither the ant nor maven [collection] builds runs the > > subpackage tests. Janek Bogucki just submitted a patch > > (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155) to change the > > entry point to the ant test target from TestAll (just the top level) to > > TestAllPackages. I have locally modified project.xml to include > > **/TestAll.java. I would like to commit these changes. Any objections? > > > > Also, why not dispense with the ant entry point (and TestAllPackages) > > and just use **/TestAll.java to select tests? What am I missing here? > > > > Phil > > > > -- > - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
