Henri Yandell wrote:
As long as 'ant test' and 'maven jar' run all the unit tests [rather than
any performance tests] I don't mind what's going on.

I'm -1 to 'ant test'/'maven jar' not running all the tests, and hadn't
realised  it wasn't running them all.

Janek's patch (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155) will fix the ant build to run all tests using TestAllPackages as the entry point. The corresponding change should be made for maven (using TestAllPackages, non **/TestAll.java). I will do this if there are no objections.



Hen


On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Rodney Waldhoff wrote:


I'm think -1 to forcing the user to use "**/TestAll.java" to
select the unit test suite to execute.  What's the harm in giving the user
a way to execute the full test suite without using Ant/Maven or an IDE to
inspect the filesystem for Test classes?

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:


Currently neither the ant nor maven [collection] builds runs the
subpackage tests. Janek Bogucki just submitted a patch
(http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23155) to change the
entry point to the ant test target from TestAll (just the top level) to
TestAllPackages. I have locally modified project.xml to include
**/TestAll.java.  I would like to commit these changes.  Any objections?

Also, why not dispense with the ant entry point (and TestAllPackages)
and just use **/TestAll.java to select tests?  What am I missing here?

Phil


-- - Rod <http://radio.weblogs.com/0122027/>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to