On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Phil Steitz wrote:
> __matthewHawthorne wrote: > > I've taken a look at some of the uid code that is currently in [lang]. > > Are we all convinced that these types of classes are definitely a good > > fit for the project? I think that they're a bit out of scope. However, > > the obvious problem is -- where else in commons to put them? > > > > > > Any other [lang] committers care to weigh in on this? My HO is that uid > generation is a useful basic language extendison and so is natural enough > for [lang]. I'm wary of adding new packages to Lang without good cause. The uid stuff has come up before as code that people want access to and there are no obvious locations for it in Commons, so I'm with Matt currently. Not enamoured with it for Lang, but nowhere else to suggest it. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
