Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:40 AM: > Jörg Schaible wrote: > >> Additionally I do not grok why the TestJNDIConfiguration now fails >> for the getKeys call. It seems not to be different from the former >> implementation, but I am sure, the tests did not fail previously. > > The test didn't not fail because getKeys() wasn't tested :) My patch > basing JNDIConfiguration on AbstractConfiguration added it.
:) Ahhh, I didn't had a look at the history of the test. Meanwhile I got also the impression, that this could have never worked with simple-jndi. Maybe we should switch to another implementtaion, since all what we want is to test the general JNDI interface and not that specific implementation. I had a look at JNDIKit from spice now located at codehaus.org. It provides a MemoryContext that could probably easily used. Even more, since this implementation supports also right-to-left namings and arbitrary delimiters so we could also mimic LDAP. I believe JNDIConfiguration would fail badly in this scenario. Regards, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
