So, does that suggest that SubsetConfiguration needs to also call the interpolate?
Eric > -----Original Message----- > From: Jörg Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 9:39 AM > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List > Subject: RE: [Configuration] Issue with subset and substitution > > > Jörg Schaible wrote on Tuesday, March 30, 2004 12:37 AM: > > > Eric Pugh wrote: > > > >>> If you have a closer look, it is quite obvious, why it does not > >>> work, since "subset" will mask now anything including the system > >>> properties. It seems that the values were resolved first in the > >>> previous version ... > >>> > >>> Comments? > > > >> I think you are right.. I update scarab (scarab.tigris.org) to use > >> the latest, and am having subset issues there as well... > > > > I did not want to create an issue in first place, since I was > > not sure, if such a resolving is really the "right" thing to > > do, but we should have a look at the old implementation. > > Basically I like the SubsetConfiguration a lot more than the > > old stuff. The (solved) problem with the > > HierarchicalConfiguration is also just because of a design > > flaw there and primilary not becasue of Subset itself. > > Well, I had a look at the old implementation of > AbstractConfiguration.subset. Originally it created a new > BasicConfiguration and copied all matching keys into it and ... > explicitly called interpolate for the values. So we have > definately a compatibility problem. > > Regards, > Jörg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
