--- "Christopher W. Farnham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:The apology for Jelly is made in Jame's weblog here:http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/2004/03/26.html#a472
Now that I reread it, I'm not sure if it's tongue and cheek or or what.It's hard to tell, but it sounds like he doesn't think much of Jelly at all. Kinda disconcerting to say the least, but I'll probably use it for now until I can find an alternative.
(i haven't worked with james for a while but) when i first read that entry, i thought that (though his opinions on xml have changed and there is a kernel of truth) it was intended to be lighthearted and humourous.
- robert
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
