Emmanuel Bourg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would still vote for a release _with_ the getVector() stuff, because
>> there are so many commons-configuration-200xyyzzzz versions floating
>> out there and an 1.0 release with getVector() would give them a
>> released baseline to work from.
>Regarding the various snapshots available, is there a way to clean the
>maven repository at Ibiblio ?
Interesting question. I found a way to move stuff _up_ (by putting
into /www/www.apache.org/dist/jakarta-repository on www.apache.org)
but not away. I would also recommend against it (even though it itches
me, too), because these jars are referenced in many projects and it's
not expected that they all disappear (e.g. the released turbine-2.3
references a snapshot and it would upset many people trying to build
the 2.3 from source if the referenced snapshot suddently disappears).
Regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH
[EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/
RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire
Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development
"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
-- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
Open Source Software Development"
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
