The following comment has been added to this issue:

     Author: Hans Gilde
    Created: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 5:27 PM
       Body:
I'm opposed to doing this. It will mean that we have to bundle the whole JSTL JAR, 
just to use one interface. 

Unless we're going to go full JSTL.... couldn't we just include our own, mock 
implementation of the interface in question? As long as it has the same methods, it 
will work just as well.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View this comment:
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-150?page=comments#action_53698

---------------------------------------------------------------------
View the issue:
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JELLY-150

Here is an overview of the issue:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
        Key: JELLY-150
    Summary: j:forEach tag not properly using varStatus attribute
       Type: Bug

     Status: Unassigned
   Priority: Major

    Project: jelly
 Components: 
             core / taglib.core
   Versions:
             1.0-beta-4
             1.0
             1.1-beta-1
             jface-1.0-beta-1
             jface-1.0
             swt-1.0
             1.0-beta-5

   Assignee: 
   Reporter: Ben Anderson

    Created: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 4:57 AM
    Updated: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 5:27 PM
Environment: win2k / cygwin

Description:
According to the jstl specification 1.1, the varStatus attribute of the forEach tag 
should create a variable with type javax.servlet.jsp.jstl.core.LoopTagStatus.  
Currently a variable is set with type Integer which contains the index of the current 
iteration.  I created a test case (I don't think any existed for forEach) that 
demonstrates this.  I also began making the fix, but it doesn't fully work.  I am 
submitting my patch along with the test cases.  The comments I placed in the code 
should be enough to tip someone off as to why it's not working (I hope).  I am 
relatively new to jelly (been using the standard taglibs for awhile) and have never 
opened the source before.  I am willing to complete the patch, but will probably need 
some guidance because I messed with it for awhile before determing I couldn't complete 
without some help.  Thanks! :-)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
JIRA INFORMATION:
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.

If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa

If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to