Hi Paul, I think we agreed it would be a good addition, and that the name should be objectData.
Is that right? If so, go for it. On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:38:52 +0200, Paul Libbrecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My little addition XMLOutput.objectData() has received little feedback > but I'd like it to get into 1.0. If no-one objects, I'd put it in... > just... I'd like enough feedback. > > paul > > Le 28 oct. 04, à 19:24, Dion Gillard a écrit : > > > > > We've covered most of the issues in Jira for Jelly to make a 1.0 > > release. > > > > I'd like to go ahead and make the current code a release candidate, > > 1.0-RC1. > > > > If anyone has changes or bugs that need to be addressed in 1.0, > > *please* raise them now, so that we can decide to either include them > > or wait. > > > > So: > > [ ] +1. Release 1.0-RC1. > > [ ] +0. Sounds good but I can't help > > [ ] -0. I don't agree, but don't want to hold the release. > > [ ] -1. Please don't. Here's why: .... > > > > > > Here's my +1. > > -- > > http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://www.multitask.com.au/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
