Paul Libbrecht wrote:
Mmmmh.... can you document more your platform and VM...
Windows, Sun Java 1.4.2_06
This test is based on freemem() and that makes, of course, the assertion quite heuristic... if we all provide numbers for each platforms, maybe we find a way to adjust the heuristic ?
Also, maybe it should be renamed as OptionalTestCoreMemoryLeak and only run when one wants ? (it is very slow anyways).
I think this is a good idea.
- Brett
paul
Le 28 déc. 04, à 02:48, Brett Porter a écrit :
The test is failing for me. Is that to be expected? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Added: jelly/src/test/org/apache/commons/jelly/core
TestCoreMemoryLeak.java BaseMemoryLeakTest.java
Removed: jelly/src/java/org/apache/commons/jelly/impl
WeakReferenceWrapperScript.java
Log:
Tag caching is now done in the JellyContext.
The TestCoreMemoryLeak shows that, at least with some usage of JellyContext.clear(), one avoids leaks.
Removing Tag-caching flag. Also, removing the WeakReferenceWrapperScript, both were in the era of ThreadLocal which is to be finished.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
