On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 17:18 -0800, Craig McClanahan wrote: > As should be evident from my own recent practice :-), I'm also +1 on > the first (XHTML) approach.
Can I ask those supporters of the XHTML style why they prefer it? Personally I think it: * increases the text size of the source file * is harder to write manually (and harder to write correctly) * makes the docs in the source file harder to read * might be easier for the javadoc app to parse, but that makes no difference to us users of javadoc; the javadoc tool support for HTML-style isn't going away. and * has no effect whatsoever on the generated html pages Not that it's a *huge* deal, but HTML-style just seems a bit better all around. Yet quite a few people obviously do prefer XHTML-style. Is it just for the "purity"? Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
