On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 17:51 -0400, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > anyone strongly object to me making the dependency
> > on the servlet api optional
> 
> I'd object if you DIDN'T.

This is only a *compile-time* dependency.

Currently there is a single utility class provided in the standard
logging jar which can be used to avoid memory leaks when using
commons-logging in servlet containers.

The presence of the class doesn't do any harm when used in
non-servlet-containers; commons-logging will run fine and the class is
simply not used.

Given this, do you still have an issue with including a class in the
standard jar which needs servletapi.jar to compile? If so, please
indicate what the problem is.

Regards,

Simon


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to