nb: top-posting, esp. in reply to a thread that already uses bottom-posting, makes an email *really* hard to read!
On Sun, 2005-10-09 at 22:59 -0500, Jacob Kjome wrote: > Can the problem be restated? Seems like this email catches the end of a > conversation. What is the issue at hand? This bugzilla entry has some of the relevant history. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34437 This thread has more discussion: http://www.mail-archive.com/log4j-dev@logging.apache.org/msg04408.html > > As for TRACE, that is new to Log4j-1.2.12 and didn't exist in versions > previous to it. If it doesn't exist in a 1.3 alpha binary release yet, it > will. There are plans to get a new 1.3 alpha build out soon. There's been > a lot of work done in the source to make 1.3 more compatible with 1.2, > which wasn't the plan early on in 1.3's development. But now the thought > is try to keep 1.3 as compatible with 1.2 as possible. If you are worried > that the current alpha is incompatible with the 1.2.xx branch, please try > building Log4j-1.3 from source and then compile against that. That will > provide a much better test of JCL 1.2.xx and 1.3 compatibility. That's nice to hear. Regards, Simon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
