DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37379>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37379 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-11-11 23:02 ------- (In reply to comment #7) > > Instead I was hoping for a minimal patch proposal for the problem you > described. That was what I did not get from your first comment: Did you want a cleaned up patch or a "cleaning the code up" patch first. Now its clear. > Additionally, your standard implementation for > > getTransactionBaseDir > > is not acceptable as a described before. This should either be configurable or > have a more reasonable implementation as also described before. Another possibility would be to use generatedUniqueTxId() as base for the directory name and to store the mapping of transaction IDs to directory names in a map. For transaction Ids already generated with the above method the key would be the same as the value, for external IDs like my Xids this would map the Xid to the directory name. As the generatedUniqueTxId() is assumed to work at the moment, this should work too. WDYT? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
