Ryan,
The idea of making it a jira issue is that it's a place you can post
to... and that people can see and comment on.
I'd put there a tag-library similarly packaged to others in
jelly/jelly-tags/.
How does it sound ?
paul
Ryan Heaton wrote:
I have not posted a jira issue. I was not aware that was needed.
You'll have to be patient with me, I really have no idea how the process to add
a component works. I would be happy to proceed
through whatever formal process has been established. If someone could explain
to me what needs to happen, I'd be happy to drive
it.
I don't even mind if the component isn't wanted in the commons, I'll put it in
sourceforge otherwise. From where I stand, I've got
something cool, I believe it will be very useful to many people, and if you
want it as part of jelly, I'm willing to submit it and
even to maintain it.
Please advise.
-Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Libbrecht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 2:17 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [jelly][vote] APT tag library
I'm slowly catching up on this.
Maybe we need to have life with Ryan a bit longer before becoming a
committer.
In order to send a fully fledged component proposal, Ryan, dare I ask
whether you've posted a jira issue already ?
This is really needed for all to look at.
thanks
paul
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 09:48 -0700, Ryan Heaton wrote:
I'm adjusting the thread subject to reflect the fact that
there is a vote going on for two things:
1. Acceptance of the new APT tag library (described below)
2. Acceptance of me as a committer to support the new apt
tag library, if it gets accepted.
So far, I have recorded three people voting positive for
both proposals:
Dion Gillard
Hans Gilde
Paul Libbrecht
hi ryan
(sorry to have to start being a little legalistic...)
i know that this can be a little confusing but there are votes and
VOTEs...
both of these need to be official ASF votes. these need
more formality
that just vague +1's against your proposal. the subject
should be [VOTE]
(jelly isn't necessary since VOTEs are commons-wide and may
result in
some filters not recognising your post as a vote thread).
we're really only getting up to speed with the new processes for
accepting code which is not original so you might need a little
patience. so, apologies in advance...
i'm not sure there's any consensus about the best way to approach
software grants but i'd expect to understand the provinence of the
donated code before i'd be willing to +1. i'd also expect a jelly
committer to start the VOTE thread.
it's not really possible to have conditional approval for a
committer
and it's poor netiquette to nominate yourself as a committer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
