On 2/13/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/13/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 2/14/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/13/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > OK I've done this for active components in "proper" and "sandbox". > > > > Couldn't test email and modler because their builds failed. > > > > > > > > > You only changed things for the Maven builds, right? The nightlies > > (which > > > use Ant) won't reflect this. (For the record, the Commons nightlies are > > > compiled with JDK 1.4.2). > > > > Yes. I assume that most components are using maven for creating > > releases. Is it an issue that they don't - or would there be an issue > > if they did? > > > It would be an issue if they did *not* use Maven ... the Ant build does not > add these two attributes to the manifest. I suspect you are correct, > though, about most people using Maven for release builds ... but we should > probably say something to that effect in the packaging instructions.
I thought we were supposed to use Ant because Maven can't run under the JVMs we generally target (which also rules out OS X :) ). Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
