On 3/5/06, Dion Gillard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/6/06, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > It's not "administatively forcing a separation", it's a natural > > > consequence > > > of a particular group of components growing up together and > > > "graduating" > > > with a common purpose. The HttpClient component grew into the > > > Jakarta HTTP > > > Components subproject, and the Jakarta Web Components subproject > > > will likely > > > absorb some Commons components as well. What makes it wrong, or even > > > different, for a group of Java-language-focussed components to > > > "graduate" > > > into Jakarta Language Components? To me, it's simply a natural > > > evolution of > > > the community. > > > > ...on the other hand it might hard to decide whether some belongs to > > that > > grouping or not. The definition of "language focussed" is just too > > blurry IMO. > > > > For example, does email fit into the language components?
csv? :) Which raises the question of what about the Sandbox. > What about tagging the components? :-P Gets a bit complicated to use tagging when mailing lists are involved. Development discussions have to happen in a single place. Hen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
