On 3/6/06, Stephen Colebourne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- James Ring wrote: > > Does CLI fit into the picture? Or do you feel that > > there are issues with it > > that would prevent it from becoming part of the > > proposed JLC?
> CLI has dependencies at present. A slimmed down CLIv2 > might be appropriate. Question is whether we believe > this would be an appropriate J2SE enhancement. I probably don't know the history of this, but why would the presence of dependencies on other JLC components make it unappropriate ? Shouldn't this be a matter of what it does ? > Thats why I attempted to describe it clearly. > > J2SE-based - so no email, xml, xpath, mbeans, daemon, > db... > Suitable for adding to the J2SE, so no validator, > chain, ... > Broad-shallow API - many small routines, not one task > per component Some of these possibly don't even belong to Jakarta (anymore), e.g. xml/xpath/digester/betwixt could be handled in XML commons, dbutils in DB etc. cheers, Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
