In M1 there's no transitive dependencies, thus your users will have to define each dependency one by one. But to improve the conversion between m1 and m2 poms for the repository, if you deploy VFS with m1 you can add the following setting : http://maven.apache.org/maven-1.x/using/bestpractices.html#Getting_ready_for_Maven_2 Arnaud
On 7/27/06, Mario Ivankovits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Jörg! > Well, therefore I would not split it at all. If you feel that the core API is right, just release 1.0 with all stuff left outside, that might cause licensing trouble. You may release 1.1 later on easily with the stuff included as soon as you have answers. Not only licensing troubles, also the thing with snapshot/not-released dependencies. bz2 and tar hurts if they are not at least easily pluggable, sure, I can copy compress (its not that big) to VFSs codebase (to a different namespace), then, only smb and webdav is missing. Its an option, but I like the snapshot jar way more. > As marked out in the other thread, marking dependencies as optional is perfectly valid. > Uhm ... this is not possible with maven 1, is it? Could you give me a hint please. Ciao, Mario --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]