On 11/28/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/>
Follow up comment on something I missed (and will apply to Rahul's digester release candidate as well). Are you planning on respinning the bits with the correct version number (1.3.1 instead of 1.3.1-RC1) before the actual vote? I prefer to vote on the real bits for an actual release.
<snap/> Yes, thats how its done. However, it needs to change, IMO. We could up the version numbers when it comes time to vote and point to the exact set of bits in the vote (but leave the tagging to until the vote passes -- assumes the "release workflow" to be 1 or more RCs followed by 1 or more votes). The m2 equivalent of staging. -Rahul
Craig
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
