On 6/24/07, Torsten Curdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 23.06.2007, at 18:59, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 6/23/07, Dennis Lundberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It is time to release version 1 of the commons-sandbox-parent. The >> latest changes includes updating the parent to commons-parent-3 and >> locking down the versions for plugins. Note that I have changed the >> artifactId to commons-sandbox-parent, to have a consistent naming >> scheme >> (compare it to commons-parent). >> >> This will be the first release and is important because it enables >> reproducible builds and site generation for the sandbox components. >> > <snip/> > > I haven't yet understood why we need to release anything from the > sandbox at all. Sure, reproducibility is a good thing, but I doubt the > builds are radically irreproducible without this release; and more > importantly, I believe if people are interested in the sandbox > components and their reproducibility, they should help get a release > out instead. IMO that's not very pragmatic. I think we would want to lower the barrier and get people involved. Providing a POM will make builds easier for the people that we want to attract. What I am failing to understand is what the fuzz is about. It's a POM ...it's metadata - not an artifact. No code! So here is my +1 for the release.
+1 to what Torsten says and +1 to the release Niall
cheers -- Torsten
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
