Shane Curcuru dijo: > Anyone worked on getting a proven-TCK-passing version of our xml-apis > component so we can have a official versioned release of this that other > projects can incorporate? > > Lacking that (I don't have the JAXP TCK setup myself), we should > recommend that other projects should just take the xml-apis.jar that's > bundled with either the Xalan or Xerces release they're using. I'm > thinking of the upcoming Ant 1.6 here. > > Oh: in terms of an xml-apis component version number, my best idea is a > multipart number based on the JAXP version number - since that's > primarily what xml-apis supports. And we should try to count any > previous > Xerces/Xalan releases as well, so our next likely xml-apis release would > be called 1.2.03 or something like that (1.2 since the branch we should > use supports the JAXP 1.2 TCK, and 03 since Xerces/Xalan have already > shipped a couple? of versions previously). Comments or other ideas?
+1 It would be a good start. Pleae keep in mind than sometimes less is more than nothing at all. Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo
