Sarah McNamara dijo:
>
>
>
>
>> Anyone worked on getting a proven-TCK-passing
>> version of our xml-apis
> The version in xml-commons tagged with Xerces-J_2_4_0 is a
> proven-TCK-passing version of xml-apis. The xml-apis.jar
> corresponding to those tags can be taken from
> xml-xerces/java/tools/xml-apis.jar (use tagged version
> Xerces-J_2_4_0 of this just to be sure).
>
> How about we put together a package that
> represents this version and post it to the downloads
> for xml-commons. Since this was the original
> tck compliant version for JAXP 1.2, we could
> call the packages:
> xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.zip
> xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.tar.gz
>
> Moving forward we want to publish from the latest in the
> tck-jaxp-1_2_0 branch which contains the SAX 2.0.1
> updates. This is also a proven-TCK-passing version
> of xml-apis. We would need to build an official binary for
> this as none exists yet. Before doing the package we
> can update the Version.java file and manifest file
> to reflect the version number of this build.
>
> So, we could publish a second package,
> xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.01.zip
> xml-apis-jaxptck1.2.01.tar.gz
>
> Sound good?
Yep. Just a question. It is really important to "print" in the name of the
jar the "jaxptck" label?
I could be just:
xml-apis-1.2.01.zip
xml-apis-1.2.01.tar.gz
What you think?
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo
