Personally, I agree with Antonio: the distribution name should just be
xml-commons-apis-1.2.01.zip or xml-commons-external-1.2.01.zip This will
of course include the sources and docs, etc. (we can think about
splitting into src/bin distros later as well; I don't think I'll have time
for that yet). We don't need the jaxptck in there since in theory we
should never be shipping an official xml-apis that doesn't pass one of the
TCKs. But the distribution name should reflect that this is a component
of the xml-commons project, like resolver and which.
Note that I'd really prefer the actual .jar name inside the distribution
should always just be 'xml-apis.jar'. If other projects want to change
it, fine; I don't like version numbers in the .jar name itself. We need
to ensure that the manifest and a Version class properly are inside there
tho.
Our, somewhat unusual, distro naming standard:
project name: xml-
subproject name: commons-
component name: apis- or external-
JAXP TCK version number: 1.2.
our specific release number 01 (then 02, then 03, etc.)
Votes for xml-commons-apis or xml-commons-external?
- Shane
---- "Antonio Gallardo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----
> Yep. Just a question. It is really important to "print" in the name of
the
> jar the "jaxptck" label?
>
> I could be just:
>
> xml-apis-1.2.01.zip
> xml-apis-1.2.01.tar.gz
