I think, as I see, 'Jakarta commons' indicates the square of applications for the small fuctions usefule to be used by other projects or applications. It means there aren't any way to refer to some or several reusable classes in an easiness. BTW, jsd is asking to refer and use some classes, I guess. Any suggestions?
Since the commons package has not been for only re-usable classes, (but small apps) I think it's better for me to start a new sandbox using URI and related classes. If it were going on, it would be an experimetal web client based on a new archicture. Sung-Gu ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tomasz Pik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: more common classes need a home > Jeffrey Dever wrote: > > There are still a bunch of classes that are in both HttpClient and > > Slide. In particular: > > Base64.java > > HttpsURL.java > > HttpURL.java > > URIException.java > > URI.java > > URIUtil.java > > URLUtil.java > > Base64 into 'codec' but the rest? > commons-net is reserved... in the time of moving from 'sandbox'. > Maybe it's a good moment for change from commons-net to > commons-protocols? Or maybe those classes should go into > commons-lang (another subpackage, lang.net, another long > discussion about the scope of lang :-)? > > -- > Regards > Tomek Pik > > > Jandalf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
