Mike Do you think it would be possible to post even a very rough, preliminary patch? Seeing how the patch is shaping up would aid us greatly in assessing various alternatives.
Cheers Oleg On Mon, 2003-02-17 at 18:21, Michael Becke wrote: > It seems that the connection wrapper solution will work. I will go > ahead and and clean up the code some and submit a patch tonight or > tomorrow. If anyone has suggestions/ideas about this change please let > me know. In particular I would like to hear some comments regarding the > following: > > - what is a good name for this connection wrapping class, currently it > is HttpConnectionAdapter? > - should this class be available outside of the > MultiThreadedHttpConnectionManager? > - once the wrapped connection has been released what should be the > default behaviour for the connection methods? I was thinking any > methods that perform I/O should throw an exception. Other methods would > just return default/empty values or do nothing. > > Mike > > Jeffrey Dever wrote: > > We were going to do a 2.0 alpha3 release, but this will wait untill the > > threading work Mike is doing with Aurelien columnates into a conclusion > > and a patch. > > > > Jandalf. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
