Eric, All credits should go to Todd. He's done pretty much all the hard work.
> Maybe it is just me, but I can live with a 1ms penalty that dramatically > increases the reliability of the re-used connections. Based on your > research, I think we should keep the isStale() check. What do others think? I agree. I think this performance penalty is well justified. I would still like to have an option of disabling the check (especially for the single-threaded connection manager), though, as the 'stale' connection check also has some nasty side-effects on SSL connections when running on older JDKs. > You might consider committing your performance test as something under > the "contrib" package so that we could look at running it with each > release, and thus keep track of the library's performance over time. Todd, would you mind contributing your code to the project? Oleg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
