[Disregard my previous post. I responded to a wrong message by mistake] Odi, That would be REALLY cool! A simple authenticating proxy (or a proxy that could effectively 'fake' popular authentication schemes) would be a very much appreciated contribution. By the way, have a look at the Christian Kohlschütter's SimpleHttpServer: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/showattachment.cgi?attach_id=9066
I think that can be a good starting point for a better framework than SimpleHttpconnection. Oleg On Mon, 2003-11-17 at 08:19, Ortwin Glück wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Oleg, > > > > I agree, our lack of auth/proxy tests is a continuous source of problems. One of > > our goals for 2.1 > > should be an effective method for testing all of the various combinations of > > proxy, authentication > > and SSL. Ideally it would be best to make this setup as simple as possible. Do > > you have any > > thoughts about how we can best accomplish this? > > > > Mike > > The various authentication methods should be tested against servlets in > the Test-Webapp. As to proxies, we must implement a couple of tiny local > servers running on different ports. Like: > > TCP 81: Proxy > TCP 82: SSL Proxy > > Those servers should be started and stopped by the test fixtures (setup > / teardown). The servers must be configurable as to which authentication > method they use. This will also ensure quality of the various > authentication methods, as currently their test cases are somewhat > minimalistic. I'd love to hack up some code for the server side this week. > > Odi > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
