i may be mis-understanding the goal … 1, it looks like you want to distinguish between elements on a web page that should be viewable in mediaviewer vs those that should not.
2. you want to use a css class to distinguish these elements. 3. you mentioned that there may be future or other use cases and so you want a generic css class; what would the other use cases be? if the idea is to distinguish between items that should be viewable in mediaviewer vs those that should not, then i like .mediaviewer .mediaviewer-item with kind regards, dan On May 12, 2014, at 23:19 , Fabrice Florin <fflo...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > Dear Dan, Geni, Hay and Jan: > > Thank you all for responding so quickly with your good suggestions! > > Do any of these ideas resonate for you more than others? Have we missed > anything else? > > 1. Ideas for a single class: > .exclude > .for-page-only > .hide > .media-reliant > .media-secondary > .media-navigational > .nommw > .noshow > .unrelated > > or ... > > 2. Ideas for multiple classes: > .navigational > .maintenance > .award > .protection > > Which of these suggestions seem more practical to you? > > Should we take this discussion onwiki? or do you think we can resolve it via > email? > > We would love to find a swift resolution together, so we can make this > feature available sooner rather than later … > > Much appreciated, > > > Fabrice > > > On May 12, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Jan Ainali <jan.ain...@wikimedia.se> wrote: > >> How about just .unrelated? Simple to understand, following the criteria you >> just mentioned. More human readable than something more technically correct >> such as .nommw >> >> Med vänliga hälsningar, >> Jan Ainali >> >> Verksamhetschef, Wikimedia Sverige >> 0729 - 67 29 48 >> >> Tänk dig en värld där varje människa har fri tillgång till mänsklighetens >> samlade kunskap. Det är det vi gör. >> Bli medlem. >> > > On May 12, 2014, at 12:58 PM, Hay (Husky) <hus...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I guess the best class name would be one that indicates that the image >> is for viewing 'in the flow of the article only', and isn't really >> meant for viewing as a standalone image (which is what you would use >> the mediaviewer for). >> >> So maybe something like: >> >> for-page-only >> media-reliant >> media-secondary >> media-navigational >> >> I guess prefixing it with 'media' would not be a bad idea as well to >> avoid having it clash with other classnames (that's why 'hide' or >> 'noshow' would probably be too generic). >> >> -- Hay >> >> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 9:48 PM, geni <geni...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I'd probably go with multiple descriptive classes rather than a single tag >>> if you are looking for future proofing. >>> >>> *navigational >>> *maintenance >>> *award >>> *protection >>> > > On May 12, 2014, at 12:43 PM, dan-nl <dan.entous.wikime...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> .not-multimedia >> >> or maybe reverse the logic and only allow tagged items to appear in media >> viewer >> >> .multimedia >> >> >> with kind regards, >> dan >> >> >> On May 12, 2014, at 21:32 , Fabrice Florin <fflo...@wikimedia.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> We would appreciate your help to come up with a class name that community >>> members can use to exclude an image from Media Viewer or related tools. >>> >>> Too many small files (like icons, flags, etc.) appear in Media Viewer for >>> some articles, even though they are unrelated to the topic of the article. >>> Other image files also need to be excluded, because they are not suitable >>> for Media Viewer (such as maps using weird CSS/JS tricks, or images which >>> use a clipping template). >>> >>> Many community members have reported this issue, which delivers an >>> unpleasant browsing experience for users who only want to view images that >>> are relevant for the article they are reading (and which are supported by >>> Media Viewer). >>> >>> We agree that this is an important issue. The most practical way to address >>> it would require editors to add a .metadata class to the images they don’t >>> want to show on a page, as proposed here: >>> >>> https://wikimedia.mingle.thoughtworks.com/projects/multimedia/cards/511 >>> >>> We just need to come up with a class name people are happy with for >>> excluding an image from Media Viewer or related tools. We already exclude >>> images which have a .metadata class, but there are images that aren't >>> really metadata but still not appropriate. >>> >>> Any ideas? What class name do you recommend we use to convey this important >>> information? >>> >>> Here are some possible ideas, to get this conversation started; >>> * hide >>> * exclude >>> * noshow >>> * ?? >>> >>> It would be best if we agreed on a name that is not tied to Media Viewer, >>> so it can be used by other tools which may have the same needs, now or in >>> the future. >>> >>> Once we settle on a class name, we can schedule that feature for >>> development, so editors can filter out unsuitable images for everyone’s >>> viewing pleasure :) >>> >>> Thanks for your feedback! >>> >>> >>> Fabrice >>> >>> _______________________________ >>> >>> Fabrice Florin >>> Product Manager, Multimedia >>> Wikimedia Foundation >>> >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF) >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Multimedia mailing list >>> multime...@lists.wikimedia.org >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Multimedia mailing list >> multime...@lists.wikimedia.org >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia > > _______________________________ > > Fabrice Florin > Product Manager > Wikimedia Foundation > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fabrice_Florin_(WMF) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Multimedia mailing list > multime...@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/multimedia _______________________________________________ Commons-l mailing list Commons-l@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/commons-l
