Sander Striker wrote: > > My point is that quite a number of people won't have the time > (or inclination) to do so. And because they don't, they aren't > listed*. : > Currently the list (auto created) on Kens page holds about > 40 committers. How many committers do we have in total? > Somewhere between 550 and 600. 40 isn't exactly an accurate > representation of our community, is it?
so the issue is painting the list as being representative, then? fine; we just mark it as 'asf people who have bothered to list pages here.' > I'm not. I'm just saying that on the members page _all_ members > are listed. what's the relevance? the members page says 'these are the members'. i don't recall seeing anyone say the list of ~name pages was to be labeled 'these are the asf committers'. quite otherwise, in fact; i've seen suggestions that it be clearly marked as incomplete and opt-in.