I'm all +1 on moving our repositories forward, but I've got used to some of the nice tools surrounding SVN that I don't want to miss.
And then there is the question of things like maven supporting SVN just as well as CVS. For bk there is some sort of "CVS compatible read-only view into the repository". Is this possible for SVN, too? Regards Henning On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 10:16, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 10:00 AM > > > Greg Stein wrote, On 10/06/2003 21.01: > >> <ObPlug> > >> Use Subversion. > >> </ObPlug> > >> > >> :-) > > > > <Cry4Help> > > Release the baby! > > </Cry4Help> > > > > ;-) > > Once Karl has finished up the branch/tag support in cvs2svn we can > do some experimenting with converting cvs repositories. This is > the major obstacle, the price of not being able to look at history, > unless going back to some cvs graveyard, when moving to svn at this > point in time. Hence the wait for cvs2svn to be finished. > > And then there is the community backing. Each project has to have > enough people wanting to move away from cvs, over to subversion. > I haven't done any polling, but I've a hunch that it won't be an > objectionless transition for all. > > > Sander > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen INTERMETA GmbH [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49 9131 50 654 0 http://www.intermeta.de/ Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development -- hero for hire --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]