On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 11:53:30 +1000 Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 10:52 am, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote: > > For me, proposed project whose final target (destination) is TLP itself > > would not fit to the incubator charter. > AFAIK, the incubator is for all new code coming to Apache whether it is > destined for an existing project or it becomes a new Apache project, so > called TLP. 1. Yes. Sure, *new code* coming to Apache is better to be incubated at Incubator project, I know. Then, how it goes with *new concept concerning with infrastructural issue*? At http://incubator.apache.org/process.html , "[others..?] " line can be added, right? 2. Okay, Incubator project can take up the would-be-TLP. I see. Then, where can I/we seek the sponsoring (mentoring) member in apache.org? ... is it possible to seek the mentoring ASF members from various TLPs in Apache? > The creation of a new Project/PMC would require a board resolution. That may > be one outcome of incubation as indicated in the above quote. O.K. *indicated* above: ... I assume I can take it with broad interpretation These lines you mentioned above gave me a broad insights into the issues for the new projects. > Conor Thank you for everything, Conor and David. I'll translate the Incubator Project's website into japanese more, and I am sure I can gain more broader insights into the incubation process in consequence of this translation process: http://incubator.terra-intl.com/ Sincerely, -- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
