On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 13:31:20 -0000 (Subject: RE: The board is not responsible!) Magnus ?or Torfason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Isn't the ASF Board ultimately responsible > > This is just wrong. Responsibility lies with the individual > > commiters, members, and their associated project PMCs. > But this seems to have been exactly the problem with the recent > discussions. The arguments have been over the use of the > announce@apache.org mailing list, and there seems to be no PMC > responsible for that list. * Fund-raising (Board Committee) * Security Team (Board Committee) * Infrastructure or Operations team (Presidents Committee) These three do not have PMC entities in the strict sense of the word. That issue was: "Infrastructure Team should not legitimatize the newsletter or vice versa." Rather, I would like to see the "Newsletter Team (Apache History Team?)" (Board Committee) and should be found at /home/cvs/committers/board/committie-info.txt ... would be an equal footing with infrastructure team. Or, "Mailing Team" (Board Committee) which would be highly associated with apmail@ entity. > Should there perhaps be such a PMC, or a PMC responsible for all > mailing lists not managed by any other PMCs? -- Tetsuya. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) --------------------------------------------------------------------- Tetsuya Kitahata -- Terra-International, Inc. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.terra-intl.com/ Apache Software Foundation Committer: http://www.apache.org/~tetsuya/ fingerprint: E420 3713 FAB0 C160 4A1E 6FC5 5846 23D6 80AE BDEA --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
