Santiago Gala wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
El mi�rcoles, 10 dici, 2003, a las 19:30 Europe/Madrid, Andrew C. Oliver escribi�:
infrastructure???? My issue with the PMCization of Apache is that everything is moving to private lists. How is this open???
Bzzz. Wrong. Nothing is moving to private lists. Creation of more PMCs and private lists are two extremely different things. Apache is in the process of creating more PMCs, as was intended since the beginning, so that community groups are responsible directly of the project without useless beaurocratic levels of indirection.
All discussions that are not extremely sensitive must happen on public lists *as always*. If it doesn't happen, it should be rectified.
Being out of all PMCs, I have been experiencing the same feelings. I suspect that we look more and more opaque from the outside, which I think is bad.
If this is the case, it *is* bad. We must ensure that all discussions happen on public lists unless it's evidently necessary, for several reasons, that they remain private to PMCs.
Overmore, all long term committers should be on the PMC, which should simply represent all the dev group.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
