On Thu, 22 Jan 2004, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: > hardly Magellan ;), but not about the health of inter-relationships of > Apache projects? Interesting. Sure, Gump is an automated feed, but is it so > inappropriate?
What was in that feed? I missed it. How would an automated feed be in any way like the rest of what's on ApachePlanet? > So, now what? Do I just add it back, or what? Maybe Planet Apache needs some > PMC control... Oh, God no. This does NOT need a PMC, or another mailing list, or to be committeed to death. > FWIIW: My observation is that Planet Apache is (at best) going to be only a > small percentage on Apache (even on OSS) topics, and it will be highly > verbose, and with high noise content ... it is the nature of that sort of > simple aggregation. [I'd like to see some form of categories utilized, so it > could filter on stuff that said it was Apache related, but I don't see that > as likely, if even technically available across tools/feeds.] I see Planet > Apache (as it stands today) as a way to get a flavour of an author, who has > some association w/ Apache, to see if I wish to add them to my own > aggregator or not. As such, I see no harm in Jakarta Gump participating. > Gump at least only ever talks about Apache stuff... Where's the fun in that? -- Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] There's more than one way to eat a rhesus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
