-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Stephen McConnell wrote: > > Maybe it's about dealing with the breach of procedure by the Chair of a > PMC and ensuring that this does not get rewarded nor repeated.
Once again, there was no technical breach of procedure. Of custom, perhaps, but not of procedure. This is another dead horse that should stop getting beaten. Complain about the violation of custom, if you like, but stop stating/insinuating that ASF policies/procedures were violated. It didn't happen, at least not in the situation under discussion. > Maybe > this is about sending a message to some of the members of the board that > coercion has consequence. Actually, I'm seeing quite a number of attempts here to 'send messages' to several different destinations. So far most of them seem to be getting marked 'return to sender.' Or perhaps they aren't really there, and I need to have my prescription changed so I don't see 'em any more. - -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBQcdBKprNPMCpn3XdAQG8WwP9FQ47BhsQpvn4AMKXAgcHgEDEGVoCtZ/X RmH6AnupOB1Y96uFgzIqlWoSP+MzkuXvuSD8BtB+HFvDfV4BGovpAAwtUE8SGEsp XNZdYakAFnTg/wWx85Yr5dXZKBLV1XKEtK5DEAmueV8JuHL729RzB6xbVVpsRJtr RELBBzoewgw= =tSDL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
