On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Marek Lindner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday, 26. August 2008 17:34:40 Yorick Moko wrote: >> Seriously, I appreciate all your efforts, but some things I just can't >> grasp: Why would any sane man remove items that provide useful >> functionality (the wrench, full qwerty) without providing an alternative?? >> You guys know a lot of us want the full qwerty, and there are already >> very nice implementations (look at the raster-image) and you guys know >> that we will try to get it back; why not give us the choice?? The >> button to toggle from the original keyboard to the full qwerty one was >> perfect. Or just add an way to install it through the installer. Just >> like you know we want a terminal, and have added that to the >> installer. > > Seriously, we can't you make your homework and find out yourself that there > _is_ a package to give you that button. Its called illume-config (not to hard > to guess) and installable via the installer. Why not simply using that choice > before ranting like mad ? > Next time, you also can do a package yourself - we happily include it. > > > Marek > > _______________________________________________ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community >
Marek, installing that illume-config package was the first thing I did yesterday. It only gives the "qwerty" button in the upper left corner. I have not found a way to enable the spanner. My apologies if I have offended you. I just want to understand why some good things were being left out at this stage. If you would give the reason to not use the keyboard like in the raster-image (or excluding the full-qwerty.kbd) at this point it would help me very much in understanding it. y _______________________________________________ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community