Hi Carl,

Would be interesting to find out if ANYONE who has Declude log entries that
show that a Whitelist match was found for an address in the Contacts table
has an DSN pointing to an MDB - or whether it only works for folks who have
it pointed to a SQL instance...

What you went through DOES make sense if you have the collaboration feature
turned on. In THAT case, it manages the shared folders, calendars etc. which
has the potential for a lot of concurrency.

Thanks for already confirming that you are using the same ODBC DSN. 
>From an API programming standpoint (in the Declude code) it shouldn't make a
difference. The high-level "OLEDB Provider for ODBC" used by ADO is the same
in both cases -- whether underneath it goes through the ODBC driver for SQL
Server or for JET.

But, once I find enough time and opportunity, I might set up a SQL database
just to see if/how Declude behaves if no one else steps forward and confirms
that an MDB / JET ODBC entry is still working in their system (like it
always has in the past).

Best Regards,
Andy


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Carl Wagar
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 1:03 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Addressbook Whitelist - what MS Access db is used?

That is strange because my ODBC DSN for WorkgroupShare points to a MSSQL
database.
the ipswitch people helped convert the old MDB over to it.
Carl


J. Carl Wagar
EntreNet Communications Inc
www.entrenet.com  www.thehostingservice.com
24 Swain Ave, Ottawa, ON, K1G 4T1, Canada
Email: [email protected], skype: jcwagar
Tel: +1 613-737-7327, Fax: +1 613-737-5801
Cel: +1 613-818-8898




#############################################################
This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list <[email protected]>.
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[email protected]>
To switch to the DIGEST mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
To switch to the INDEX mode, E-mail to <[email protected]>
Send administrative queries to  <[email protected]>

Reply via email to