On Saturday, August 3, 2002, at 07:24  pm, william ahearn wrote:

> While being true, the production of a newspaper isn't
> nearly as demanding as other forms of desktop
> publishing. At one time, I was a pasteup artist on a
> city daily. In those days it had an AM and a PM.
> Frankly, with the exception of color pictures, most
> newspapers look exactly as they did during the physical
> pasteup days. Glossy magazines, on the other hand, have
> really tweaked and redefined the medium using the
> available software and whatever style innovation is
> this week's flavor. Quark 3.3 should do you fine for
> the next five years considering how staid most print
> newspapers remain.
>

I 100% concur! The newspaper in question is still with 7.5.5 as well!

Stuart


-- 
Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>.

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml>
The FAQ:                <http://macfaq.org/>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to