Yes you're probably right about the sacred ground ... OTOH, I never said
whether I thought Jobs would have done any better. :-) IMHO, the Newton was
ahead of its time. Now the eMate was just a bad idea.

> From: Jack Gallemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Compact Macs" <[email protected]>
> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:47:39 -0500
> To: "Compact Macs" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: .Megaphone
> 
> Really?  Jobs?  When Amelio brought us the Newton?
> (I sense I'm treading on sacred or flaming grounds here. <G>)  I think
> Jobs is a great marketer and has a good head about what design should
> be about, but as far as execution, I think that people like Jef Raskin
> was far and away the better designer.
> Jack
> On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:25 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
>> I had this with my 6400 & 6500 which I think are basically the same
>> machine
>> as the 6300. The deal with Megaphone is that it was designed for use
>> with
>> Apple's messed-up GeoPort modem experiment. I don't think it will work
>> on
>> anything else but that modem as it relies on the processor/hardware
>> hybrid
>> setup that no other modem on the planet uses. So many squashed Apples
>> on the
>> long road that now brings us the iPod. Wonder what it would have been
>> like
>> if Jobs had been there the whole time.
>> 


-- 
Compact Macs is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/>.

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Compact Macs list info: <http://lowendmac.com/lists/compact.shtml>
  --> AOL users, remove "mailto:";
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[email protected]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive:<http://www.mail-archive.com/compact.macs%40mail.maclaunch.com/>


---------------------------------------------------------------
iPod Accessories for Less
at 1-800-iPOD.COM
Fast Delivery, Low Price, Good Deal
www.1800ipod.com
---------------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to