| > why is the CC defined as gcc ? (why not studio cc ?)
| 
| Either because at some point in the past whoever integrated xterm couldn't
| get it to compile with Studio or because the Makefile was copied from
| another component which couldn't be compiled with Studio.  It's also
| possible that at the time, it was a given that few things would compile
| with Studio, so gcc was assumed.  Mike might know the real answer.

Actually I was thinking about the companion-cd default CC. (not setting the
CC or setting it to CC=$(CC) still builds it with gcc. )

| >  +resize.patch
| >  The termio struct complains about getting redefined when xtermcap.h is
| > included in this file. Since the file compiles correctly with out
| > including xtermcap.h I assume no functionality is broken.
| 
| Hm.  Please test.  And please send Thomas a note; he may have some idea of
| what's going on.

I have tested it. will check with Thomas.

| Did you have to add the README fresh?  There is, or at least was, a
| README.sfw file that talked a little about what patches were applied and
| how it was built.  Is that no longer there?

I had to do the METADATA and README.SFWxterm fresh.

                                    rahul
--
1. e4 _

Reply via email to