rahul wrote:
> (Updated diffs attached.)
>
> A question on the scaffolding..
>
> why is the CC defined as gcc ? (why not studio cc ?)
Originally because the entire CCD was compiled with gcc, as the
Studio compilers were not free at the time the CCD was created
(Solaris 8ish), and I felt that it would be nice if folks could
rebuild the bits if they wanted to using the gcc on the CCD.
Since then, I don't know, perhaps there's no reason to use gcc
anymore if Studio compiles it fine. Then again if there's no
improvement then why bother :) But feel free to investigate.
Mike
