-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm not sure I'm using the same exact same code for AnchorMan, I remember that I found some improvements after building AnchorMan but this doesn't apply to GenAnchor_1k which has no special enhancements.
I'm surprised that Anchor_1k is 1560 and this may explain it. I may put a 5k version to see how much improvement there is. GenAnchor appears to be about 200 ELO weaker. It is from the same code base but without the various move incentives. - - Don Jason House wrote: > > > On 9/28/07, *Jason House* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Since there's obviously some kind of major performance gap, for now > I'll aim to align with Anchor_1k. From there, I hope it'll be > easier to diagnose what's going wrong. > > > > Correction: I meant to say GenAnchor_1k > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > computer-go mailing list > computer-go@computer-go.org > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFG/O+xDsOllbwnSikRAgS2AKDXJ8nvgcfoNwmam1mSLBXbL64+xwCfY4NW kB/xs+gP7OFOhuZuDIBz/ls= =S/TD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
