I thought it was an interesting article, full of gems and annoyances.
I couldn't help to get the feeling the author was poking fun at
Kasparov at times.

Despite that, I am curious to see what kind of hardware he and his
students produce.  Guess if there is going to be a Deep Go he'd be the
one to design it. Should make for some interesting progress in our
field.

-Josh

On 10/7/07, Benjamin Teuber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quite interesting, but after all, it completely neglects the difficulties to
> a) determine the life status of groups
> b) build an evaluation function out of this
>
> Benjamin
>
> Joshua Shriver schrieb:
> > Found this link and thought you all might find it interesting.
> >
> > http://www.spectrum.ieee.org/oct07/5552
> >
> > Interesting part for me so far:
> >
> > " At my lab at Microsoft Research Asia, in Beijing, I am organizing a
> > graduate student project to design the hardware and software elements
> > that will test the ideas outlined here. If they prove out, then the
> > way will be clear for a full-scale project to dethrone the best human
> > players."
> >
> > Thoughts, comments?
> >
> > Deep Go anyone?
> > -Josh
> > _______________________________________________
> > computer-go mailing list
> > computer-go@computer-go.org
> > http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> computer-go mailing list
> computer-go@computer-go.org
> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
>
_______________________________________________
computer-go mailing list
computer-go@computer-go.org
http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/

Reply via email to