2007/10/10, Don Dailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Andrés, > > You are right about null move of course. The assumption that other > moves are >= to the value of a pass is much stronger in GO than in > Chess, yet ironically it's not as effective in Go.
That was what i was trying to say. Pass is one of the worst moves (except final) is good for null-move on Go. Of course you have reduced depth, probably bad with alpha-beta with a bad evaluation function, but looks interesting with UCT reducing the number of simulations and increasing the % value. I don't use UCT, so I haven't tried it. Andrés
_______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
