Why don't you mention the several versions on one login name problem? And, I considered CGOS is not the Nascar type commercial races but a field to help developers to improve their progrms, say, in some academic sense.
What is your reason to name it as 'Hall of fame'? I'm not Western and can just estimate the value of the name but it's so heavy and important, isn't it? -Hideki Don Dailey: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >Many strong programs have 100% scores against many opponents and many >games. They cannot be hanging up very often. > >When the server hangs, the current game you are playing is not scored. > I don't think there is a major problem here. > >As far as network problems CGOS considers that part of the computing >system. If you provider is having glitches that affect your program I >can't account for that. It's the same if you lose your connection and >lose on time as a result. It's part of your "equipment", it's as if >you had automobile failure at the Nascar races or your tennis racket >breaks during an important point. > >- Don > > > > >Hideki Kato wrote: >> Hi Don, >> >> Don Dailey: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >>> I want to clarify this: >>> >>> The new CGOS chart uses bayeselo to recalculate all the ratings for the >>> players - it does not use CGOS ratings. >>> >> >> Hm, now I remembered that there were not so few games wrongly ended >> and scored by server's hang-up. In addition, recently my bot has >> lost some games by, perhaps, network delay over one minute. >> Moreover there might be many bots with different minor versions >> under same login name. >> >> Such accidents and/or troubles were not so severe because we could see >> and mind only current ratings but it's changing now. >> >> I think this excellent idea is too early to do unless we can exclude >> wrongly scored games. Otherwise the ratings include some error that >> we cannot estimate. It should not be suitable for the name of 'Hall >> of fame'. >> >> -Hideki >> >> >>> I may update this list each month. I wanted to make it a top 100 list >>> but FatMan does not even make the top 100. >>> >>> >>> - Don >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Don Dailey wrote: >>> >>>> I put up a web page that displays EVERY player who has played at least >>>> 200 games on CGOS. >>>> >>>> It uses the bayeselo program that Rémi authored. >>>> >>>> >>>> http://cgos.boardspace.net/9x9/hof.html >>>> >>>> >>>> I'm not sure I used the program correctly - it's rather complicated and >>>> I'm not that great with statistics. If anyone is interested in the >>>> settings I used I can provide that. >>>> >>>> - Don >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> computer-go mailing list >>>> computer-go@computer-go.org >>>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> computer-go mailing list >>> computer-go@computer-go.org >>> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >>> >> -- >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) >> _______________________________________________ >> computer-go mailing list >> computer-go@computer-go.org >> http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ >> >> >_______________________________________________ >computer-go mailing list >computer-go@computer-go.org >http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list computer-go@computer-go.org http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
