Though my program is not strong :), I bet new algorithms. Especially, better (heavy)-playout with not only spatial features but also temporal ones, which gives small error of the score, and better uct part with some enhancement, perhaps, with RL.
-gg Darren Cook: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >I have a strong interest in seeing a 19x19 computer go program that is >at least 3-dan by 2010. The recent jump in strength on the 9x9 board has >given me new hope and I want to ask people here, especially the authors >of strong programs, what you now need to make the next jump in strength. >There seem to be four broad categories: > > * More hardware (CPU cycles? Memory? Faster networking? Do you just >need that hardware for offline tuning, or for playing too?) > > * More data > > * New algorithms (if so, to solve exactly what? evaluation? search? other?) > > * More community > >By community I mean things like this mailing list, CGOS, open source >projects, etc. > >By data I mean things like: game records, or board positions, marked up >with correct/incorrect moves; game records generally; pattern libraries; >test suites; opening libraries. > >Darren -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kato) _______________________________________________ computer-go mailing list [email protected] http://www.computer-go.org/mailman/listinfo/computer-go/
